Liquidation value vs. going-concern value
Two valuation benchmarks for the insolvency estate: proceeds from piecemeal liquidation versus the higher value achieved selling the business as a continuing, functioning unit.
Liquidation value is the proceeds an administrator achieves by realising the debtor's assets individually — machinery to dealers, inventory to close-out buyers, real estate sold separately. Going-concern value, by contrast, is the price a buyer pays for the business as a living, functioning unit — including customer relationships, a trained workforce and ongoing contracts.
The administrator is statutorily required to realise the higher of the two values in creditors' interest (§ 1 InsO). In most cases with a viable core, going-concern value clearly exceeds liquidation value — going-concern sales are therefore the norm whenever a serious buyer shows up in time, before the report meeting.
For buyers, the gap between the two values is the real negotiating room: an offer noticeably above the estimated liquidation value is hard for the administrator to turn down, even if it stays below a healthy market multiple — because their statutory alternative isn't the market price, it's piecemeal liquidation.
Related terms
- → Going-concern— Acquisition of the business as a continuing entity — staff, customers, operations stay tog…
- → Insolvency administrator— Court-appointed representative of the insolvency estate. Takes disposal rights, monetises …
- → Berichtstermin (report meeting, § 156 InsO)— First creditors' assembly in the proceeding. Administrator reports asset status and propos…
- → Asset deal— Acquisition of individual assets (brand, inventory, contracts, staff) instead of company s…